Sean (udoswald) wrote in talk_politics,
Sean
udoswald
talk_politics

  • Mood:
This is why crucial infrastructure should never be owned by private companies. Profit motive does not always/usually/ever line up with what is best or what is most efficient for the user, especially when there is no acceptable alternative (if you want to get from Detroit to Canada this is pretty much your only choice). This problem would not have occurred if the bridge was owned by the State. Why should Moroun profit from this bridge, especially when he can't even bring himself to make essential upgrades to the thing?
Tags: infrastructure
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 69 comments